Has the information on this website motivated you to speak to your cardiologist about CAMZYOS?
This website is best viewed
using the horizontal display
on your tablet device.
This website is best viewed
using the vertical display
on your mobile device.
Barbara, a patient living with symptomatic obstructive HCM, and her husband Tom were compensated for their time. Individual results may vary.
HCM=hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
CAMZYOS helped to improve some of my symptoms and to get part of my life back again.
—Barbara
Barbara, who was told as a child she had a heart murmur, was used to living with symptoms such as occasionally becoming out of breath or feeling faint on a very hot day. This was her "normal," so it didn’t occur to her to see a doctor about it. But one day when she was being prescreened for unrelated back surgery, she was diagnosed with symptomatic obstructive HCM. Barbara was put on a beta blocker for a period of time, but her symptoms were still not improving to where she’d like. She was told that she would be a candidate for surgery, but by advocating for herself, she learned about a clinical trial. She was eligible to enroll, and after completion she learned she was receiving CAMZYOS.
Individual results may vary.
CAMZYOS is being studied in the longest clinical study for a treatment of its kind.*
There are limitations to the long-term study. These data are not included in the CAMZYOS U.S. Full Prescribing Information. These data are based on real observations as part of an ongoing study. These data have not yet been tested to determine if results are based on real effect or random chance. All participants knew they were taking CAMZYOS, which may have influenced the results.
*CAMZYOS is a cardiac myosin inhibitor.
†Though it wasn't a requirement of the study, most of the participants remained on their previous medication, a beta blocker or calcium channel blocker.
‡The primary goal of the long-term study was to evaluate safety and efficacy.
§Amongst the efficacy outcomes, a range of 90 to 95 patients to date (of 231) have reached Week 180 for evaluation.
Results showed that more people taking CAMZYOS achieved this outcome (37%, 45/123)
compared with those taking placebo (17%, 22/128).
¶Some improvement=improved pVO2 by at least 1.5 mL/kg/min. More improvement=improved pVO2 by at least 3.0 mL/kg/min.
Of those taking CAMZYOS, 65% (80/123) improved by one or more NYHA class compared with 31% (40/128) of those taking a placebo.
IIAmongst the efficacy outcomes, a range of 90 to 95 patients to date (of 231) have reached Week 180 for evaluation.
How was this measured? Symptom improvement was defined as a lower NYHA class at this time in the study.
Symptomatic oHCM is a chronic disease and CAMZYOS is not a cure. Why is this
important?
People who took CAMZYOS had an average decrease in their LVOT gradient of 47 mmHg (started at 86 mmHg and went down to 38 mmHg), and people who took a placebo had an average decrease of 10 mmHg (started at 84 mmHg and went down to 73 mmHg).
People who took CAMZYOS had an average decrease in their LVOT gradient of
55 mmHg (a 79% reduction) from the start of the study to the interim analysis at approximately 3.5 years.
How was this measured? At the beginning and end of the study, the obstruction in people’s hearts was measured with an echocardiogram after they exercised. This was done to find out how much blood was able to pump out of the heart in millimeters of mercury, or mmHg. Doctors call this measurement the left ventricular outflow tract, or LVOT, gradient. A lower LVOT gradient means there is less obstruction in the heart. Symptomatic oHCM is a chronic disease and CAMZYOS is not a cure. The data for LVOT gradient presented in the long-term study were measured while doing a breathing method called the Valsalva maneuver. Why is this
important?
From when they started the study to when it ended, people taking CAMZYOS reported an
average change in score of +14, and those who took placebo reported an average change in
score of +4. The average baseline score was 71 for patients starting the trial.
How was this measured? How much people were bothered by their symptoms and experienced physical limitations was assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (23-item version)–Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS). Higher scores represent better health status.
From when they started the study to when it ended, people taking CAMZYOS reported an average change in score of -3 and those who took placebo reported an average change in score of -1. The average baseline score was 5 for patients starting the trial.
From the beginning of the long-term study to this analysis, 90 people taking CAMZYOS reported an average change in score of -3.7. The average baseline score was 6 for people at the start of the study.
How was this measured? The frequency and severity of people’s shortness of breath was assessed using the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Symptom Questionnaire–Shortness-of-Breath subscore (HCMSQ-SoB). Lower scores represent less shortness of breath.
CAMZYOS reduced the number of patients who were eligible for, or who chose to undergo, surgery at 16 weeks (avoiding surgery)
A 16-week study of 112 people compared two groups of adults with symptomatic obstructive HCM. One group (56 people) took CAMZYOS while the other group (56 people) took a placebo. When the study started, everyone had symptoms. Some (7%) had moderate symptoms (NYHA Class II), but most (93%) had severe symptoms (NYHA Class III or IV). Everyone’s obstructive HCM was so advanced that they were eligible for heart surgery.
WHAT THE STUDY RESULTS SHOWED
The study looked at how many people either:
Remained eligible for surgery at Week 16
OR
Decided to proceed with surgery prior to or at Week 16
Results showed that CAMZYOS reduced the proportion of patients who were eligible for, or who chose to undergo, surgery.
18% of people taking CAMZYOS (~1 out of 5) and 77% of people taking placebo (~4 out of 5) remained eligible for surgery at 16 weeks or chose to undergo surgery prior to or at Week 16. Two people in each group decided to have surgery.
4 out of 5 people who took CAMZYOS experienced improvements in their symptomatic obstructive HCM to the point that they were able to avoid surgery# at 16 weeks
vs 1 out of 5 people who took placebo
#No longer eligible and did not choose to undergo surgery at Week 16.
Most people in this study (95%) were also taking additional treatments for their HCM, such as a beta blocker, calcium channel blocker, disopyramide, or a combination of these.
If you and your doctor are considering CAMZYOS, it’s important to know the answers to these questions:
What are the serious side effects of CAMZYOS?
A serious side effect is a side effect that can sometimes be life-threatening and lead to death.
CAMZYOS may cause serious side effects, including heart failure (a condition where the heart cannot pump with enough force).
In the long-term study, 10 (4.3%) people in the study experienced drug-related serious adverse events, which included cardiac failure (n=3), ejection fraction decreased (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=1), and atrial flutter (n=1).
Get medical help right away if you experience new or worsening symptoms, including:
What are the most common side effects?
The most common side effects of CAMZYOS include dizziness and fainting (syncope).
In the long-term study, 228 (98.7%) people experienced ≥1 drug-related adverse reaction. The most common drug-related adverse reactions occurring in >5% of people were COVID-19 infection (n=92), dizziness (n=41), hypertension (n=36), and nasopharyngitis (n=36).
For more information, please see the U.S. Full Prescribing Information, including Boxed WARNING and Medication Guide for CAMZYOS. Talk to your healthcare provider for more information about this medication.
Get Tips for Talking